+1 , this sounds much better than what I dug up. In the long run we should still look into shared stylesheets (based on a hash of the style output independent of feature type ids... So still calculate it for every feature, but save a lot of bandwidth).
-Arne Andrea Aime wrote: > Arne Kepp ha scritto: >> The 2.1 schema contains a lot of garbage. I didn't actually read your >> email (sorry, on my way out :) ) , but check >> http://schemas.opengis.net/kml/2.2.0/ogckml22.xsd > > Oh, ok. Well, in that schema the names changed slightly, but the > substance seems the same: > * PlaceholderType extends from AbstractFeatureType > * AbstractFeatureType can contain a styleUrl or an > AbstractStyleSelectorGroup that is of type > AbstractStyleSelectorType > * StyleType extends from AbstractSTyleSelectorType > > So besides the much longer to read names (thank you OGC!) > it still seems my suggestion applies > > Cheers > Andrea > -- Arne Kepp OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
