Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Hi David, > > This makes sense to me. I Don't the ows5-kml stuff is really used...just > an experiment. So I could go ahead. Andrea can comment on if that code > is actually needed. If so it sounds like it will be easy enough to > rewrite to come inline with the api changes.
I believe no-one is actually using that ows5 module, thought there are a couple things there that it would be nice to salvage, such as dumping the feature attributes out on demand (KML 2.2 has an optional feature data section, making it go quite close to GML in terms of simple features). Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
