<snip> > > Just one observation. From the roadmap it seems we won't have > resource/map split in 2.0. > At the moment layers are published on: > /layers/<l>[.<format>] > but when we push on the separation and make maps (virtual geoservers > with a limited set of layers), they will be probably put into: > <map>/<l>[.<format>] Yeah, I thought a little about this. And basically my thought is that to deprecate the /layers/<l> syntax once we the split. To support the old syntax we use the same lookup tricks we use today for layers and feature types: 1) check for a prefixed name and 2) check for case of a single layer with that name, etc...
For instance to reference the following layer: /maps/m/layer/l We allow people to use /layers/m:l Or just /layers/l If only a single map has a layer named "l". -Justin > > This kind of change will occur most likely in some 2.x.y release, > depending one when resource to actually develop it become available. > So we'll probably break the rest API, but (I guess) not in 2.0.0 > > Cheers > Andrea > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
