Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > This was indeed something I bounced back and forth on when redesigning > the interfaces. And in the end it did not seem to make sense to have > LayerGroup be a "layer", as many of the properties do not apply. As far > as I know this is just an issue when trying to iterate everything > "renderable" correct?
Yep, so the issue presents itself when generating the wms capabilities and the preview list (they are, in fact, strictly connected. > As for the workspace and enabled flag, yes that makes sense. Although I > think Map would be the more appropriate container since we are dealing > with publishing, but of course we are at an annoying middleground where > the entity does not yet exist. Besides having a name, a container (map > or workspace), and an enabled/disabled flag is there any other common > properties they would share? Nope, not at the moment. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
