Andrea Aime wrote: > Andrea Aime ha scritto: >> I don't care if we run the cite tests a bit slower. >> What I'm worried about is that we would remove some test coverage on >> the case that people do really run in production, since the CITE tests >> would not test it anymore. >> Are you sure our unit tests provide the same coverage over GML encoding >> as the cite tests do? > > And oh, forgot to mention the obvious, but if the new encoder can > get in the same ballpark as the old encoder speed wise, the whole > argument of discussion ceases to exist, we can have the new encoder > as the only one, use it always, test and production, and don't worry > about perf issues ;-) > I know you're working on it, wondering if we can start kicking the > tires of your patches sooner rather than later?
Well they are still pretty rough, the result of raw experimentation so nothing ready to commit in patch for format. And I of course want to do some rigorous testing before I proceed. The rest of this week is looking pretty busy but perhaps in the next couple of weeks... > > Cheers > Andrea -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
