Rob Atkinson ha scritto: > Will it help if we aim for CITE compliance with 2.0, using the > app-schemas stuff.?
I want them both, app schema and non app schema case. The non app schema case is still 100% of our current user base, the app schema case will expand it but I don't see it becoming the primary use case for a while, lots of custom apps are built on top of GeoServer that don't care at all about shareable schemas. > For people who will care about CITE, they are probably going to care > about app-schema support as well (cf. INSPIRE). CITE has been the only test GeoServer had for a long time, and our unit test is still far away from covering all the tests a normal cite run does (500+ tests in wfs 1.1 without complex features alone). > IMHO we could afford to let CITE conformance slide for pre 2.0 > versions - in much the same way as we dont try to certify OGC > conformance for every release. We don't try to certify for a cost reason. Letting go compliance for the stable series would be foolish in my opinion, it will a definite contradiction in terms (stable series, and not compliant? We don't ever release a stable if we don't pass all CITE tests). Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
