All in all patch looks good David. And thanks for including test cases 
with it :).

One question I noted on the issue. Is ResourceInfo.getTitle() not 
suitable for the title? Or is it a different intention?

Also, just a point of discussion (not a issue with the patch), I wonder 
if we should break out an actual class for this type of metadata?

David Winslow wrote:
> Hi all.  I've done some work on adding support for the optional
> Attribution field in the WMS capabilities document.  I'd like a review
> on the patch attached to http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3181 .  
> 
> The patch uses resource metadata to store title, link, and logo image
> info for attribution on each layer, and provides a panel on the
> Publishing tab for configuring them.  If a layer has these properties,
> then they are encoded during a capabilities request (since each field is
> optional, my code will render a partial Attribution field if some of the
> information is missing, eg, just a title and link if no logo is
> provided.)
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --
> David Winslow 
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference!
> Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250.
> Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today!
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel


-- 
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to