Justin Deoliveira wrote: > Maybe we need a better code coverage tool. We could try going back to > clover... but it requires a special license, and maintainance of the > license.
Which is why we stopped using it. > The nice thing about cobertura is it works out of the box. I like cobertura. Integration with maven is great; it just works. The reports are very clear and make review of coverage localisation easy. I do not think that overall coverage is a useful metric. In fact, I do not think any metric is useful except as a warning. I am starting to appreciate the value of cobertura in drawing my eye to undercovered code, hot spots in need of attention. > One thing I have been interested in looking at lately is sonar: > http://sonar.codehaus.org/ > Which seems like a nice tool for doing this sort of stuff. No idea what > the reports for code coverage look like or what engine it uses > internally. Have you looked into it at all? Even looks like there is a > hudson plugin available for it. Sorry, I have not used it. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining Australian Resources Research Centre 26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
