Andrea Aime wrote: > Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >> Hi all, >> >> Release release release. We have a release going 1.7.6 this week and an >> up coming release scheduled for next. >> >> * 1.7.6 release >> >> I believe it is in progress being worked on by Mark. How is that going Mark? > > I'd like to point out quite a few annoying bugs have been squashed > recently and people kept asking if they were going to be included > in 1.7.6. I replied that 1.7.6 was already tagged, yet it's sort of a > pity not to have the fixes in, a few are annoying and close to one liners: > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3287 > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3292 > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3304 > I think Gabriel had an important raster symbolizer fix as well. > > Usually I'd say ok, next month but... will there be a 1.7.7?
Now that we have some more resources for performing releases I don't see why not. Keeping with the per month release cycle still does seem a bit much at this point but I am definitely not against it. Also at this point in a stable branch the nightly builds are pretty safe to use. > >> * 2.0-RC1 release date >> >> Scheduled for August 3 which makes it next week. How does everyone feel >> about that date? To soon? Do we need to push back? > > Hummm... feels a little early to me, it all depends on how much > effort we can put into it. > >> * 2.0-RC1 priority fixes >> >> The only high priority left open is: >> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2887, jdeolive >> Port all extensions to trunk >> >> The extensions that still need to be ported: >> >> * sqlserver >> * feature-pregen >> * imagemosaic-jdbc >> >> Any other issues that need to be high priority? > > This ones should be fixed too imho: > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3302 > (regression) > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3295 > (regression) > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3294 > (non trivial change, better done earlier) > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3259 > (current status is a work in progress, new > page unfinished, edit page not modified) > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3170 > (small, but still a regression) > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3110 > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3188 > (one of the two, please let's get RC1 out without > the white hole in the home page :-) Ok, this list as is represents quite a bit of work so it would mean pushing back the release substantially. At this point I would prefer we keep things to regressions only (and maybe low hanging fruit) or I fear we will go down a feature creep path of improvements that might not end. We should also try to set more realistic dates for the RC1 to 2.0 release cycle as well, rather than bomb with a bunch of issues shortly before a release is due and push back the date. The reason being not because I am against pushing back, more that it is misleading to users who are watching the road map dates planning for 2.0. > > Cheers > Andrea > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
