Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Andrea Aime wrote: >> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Release release release. We have a release going 1.7.6 this week and >>> an up coming release scheduled for next. >>> >>> * 1.7.6 release >>> >>> I believe it is in progress being worked on by Mark. How is that >>> going Mark? >> >> I'd like to point out quite a few annoying bugs have been squashed >> recently and people kept asking if they were going to be included >> in 1.7.6. I replied that 1.7.6 was already tagged, yet it's sort of a >> pity not to have the fixes in, a few are annoying and close to one >> liners: >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3287 >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3292 >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3304 >> I think Gabriel had an important raster symbolizer fix as well. >> >> Usually I'd say ok, next month but... will there be a 1.7.7? > > Now that we have some more resources for performing releases I don't see > why not. Keeping with the per month release cycle still does seem a bit > much at this point but I am definitely not against it. Also at this > point in a stable branch the nightly builds are pretty safe to use. >> >>> * 2.0-RC1 release date >>> >>> Scheduled for August 3 which makes it next week. How does everyone >>> feel about that date? To soon? Do we need to push back? >> >> Hummm... feels a little early to me, it all depends on how much >> effort we can put into it. >> >>> * 2.0-RC1 priority fixes >>> >>> The only high priority left open is: >>> >>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2887, jdeolive >>> Port all extensions to trunk >>> >>> The extensions that still need to be ported: >>> >>> * sqlserver >>> * feature-pregen >>> * imagemosaic-jdbc >>> >>> Any other issues that need to be high priority? >> >> This ones should be fixed too imho: >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3302 >> (regression) >> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3295 >> (regression) >> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3294 >> (non trivial change, better done earlier) >> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3259 >> (current status is a work in progress, new >> page unfinished, edit page not modified) >> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3170 >> (small, but still a regression) >> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3110 >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3188 >> (one of the two, please let's get RC1 out without >> the white hole in the home page :-) > > Ok, this list as is represents quite a bit of work so it would mean > pushing back the release substantially.
Not necessarily. I'm finding out that working on benchmarking alone is not a very productive use of my time, I usually need to mull over perf issues a bit before getting a solution. In the meantime I can squash some jira :-) > At this point I would prefer we > keep things to regressions only (and maybe low hanging fruit) or I fear > we will go down a feature creep path of improvements that might not end. I guess I can fix most of those by mid of next week, maybe earlier. Is that going to be ok? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
