Sounds good to me. I don't see any drawback.

Cheers,
Gabriel
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Gabriel Roldan ha scritto:
>>> Any comments on the API? The biggest question is whether having a kvp
>>> Map is overkill or not. And if not, should it still be possible to
>>> have GET parameters appended into the URL without them being in the
>>> kvp?
>> question: what is your intended use for URLType? I see you may want to 
>> append or not your auth token based on whether the url points outside 
>> the server or not... still, I don't think there're programmaticaly 
>> created URLs pointing outside the server? (at least none that I can 
>> think of off the top of my head)
> 
> Right, at the moment we don't, but in theory we could, or new
> services might have a need to. With REST extensions and the work
> David is doing on integrating Javascript and the interest in other
> scripting languages I think it's fair to assume we'll see other
> people needing to generate links in their responses: we cannot
> exclude those will never point outwards.
> 
>> API wise, in principle the approach is correct. Now that we settled 
>> down the separation of concerns between service response urls (usually 
>> schema    locations, either static or dynamically generated like 
>> DescribeFeatureType), the fact is that all URL constructions in 
>> GeoServer go through the RequestUtils.baseUrl(HttpServletRequest) 
>> method, so it seems that's where to inject the extension point?
>>
>> I've cooked the following patch which hopefully may simplify a bit the 
>> API and still provide enough context as to create your callback: 
>> <http://pastebin.com/m24ed06a0>
>>
>> Please tell me if it seems appropriate or am I missing something.
> 
> The spirit of the above is right, but the implementation as is won't
> work. Sampo needs to add a kvp parameter to the request, the existing
> code uses the proxifier just to change the base url and then
> adds a extension path and kvp params.
> That needs to be changed so that the code needing to build a URL
> passes the base path (http://host:port/geoserver), the extension
> to the base (/wms), whatever kvp parameter (request=GetMap) so that
> the utility method building the final url can:
> - change the base path if needed
> - change the URL params if needed
> - assemble a final URL
> 
> The changes above would be done by calling the URL callbacks (the one 
> that changes the base path would be just another callback).
> 
> What needs doing is to add the above API and then change the call
> points that build a URL so that they use the new API (there are
> around 40 calling points in the code base).
> 
> Makes sense?
> 
> Cheers
> Andrea
> 


-- 
Gabriel Roldan
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to