Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > > Andrea Aime wrote: >> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >>> Any objections to this? If the appropriate people want to give me >>> access to the build box I would be happy to try and do this. >> >> Sure, go ahead. The login is the same as the main build box. >> I could not see any specific setting, hope you have better luck :) > > Cool. And yeah, it is because it is a maven specific job it seems. Any > objections to havign it mirror the other hudson as a freestyle build? > The maven build seems easier to maintain but my fear is that spamming > the dev list will cause people to ignore it.
Actually the main hudson box is using regular maven builds too it seems: http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/configure May be just the different Hudson version. If we switch away I also think we'll loose the unit testing reporting that made people ask we upgrade the main build box as well. Maybe it's better to ask on the Hudson mailing list if it's possible somehow to avoid this mail flood without throwing away the other benefits? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
