Ok, seems I was confused. I could have sworn I set up the original hudson like that. Seems I am losing it. But yeah, i guess it is time to dig deeper into the hudson docs or configuration files to try and find the option for a single mail.
Andrea Aime wrote: > Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >> >> Andrea Aime wrote: >>> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >>>> Any objections to this? If the appropriate people want to give me >>>> access to the build box I would be happy to try and do this. >>> >>> Sure, go ahead. The login is the same as the main build box. >>> I could not see any specific setting, hope you have better luck :) >> >> Cool. And yeah, it is because it is a maven specific job it seems. Any >> objections to havign it mirror the other hudson as a freestyle build? >> The maven build seems easier to maintain but my fear is that spamming >> the dev list will cause people to ignore it. > > Actually the main hudson box is using regular maven builds too it seems: > http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geotools-trunk/configure > > May be just the different Hudson version. > If we switch away I also think we'll loose the unit testing reporting > that made people ask we upgrade the main build box as well. > > Maybe it's better to ask on the Hudson mailing list if it's possible > somehow to avoid this mail flood without throwing away the other > benefits? > > Cheers > Andrea > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
