On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]> wrote: > Andrea Aime wrote: >> Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >>> I have never actually seen that document let alone run geoserver as a >>> dyncamic web project. >> >> Indeed looking at that page history: >> http://geoserver.org/pages/viewpreviousversions.action?pageId=10420240 >> >> It seems it was contributed by a user well over one year ago. >> But as we both pointed out, none of the developers ever tried to start >> GS that way, running withing Jetty using Start.java is just easier. > > The only benefit I can see is that it could potentially allow for some > debugging in the tomcat container. But quite a bit of work to setup by > the looks of the page. Although I think some of the steps could be > removed. For instance hacking the .project files to add the natures and > build commands, we could configure the eclipse plugin to add those > autmoatically. But yeah, stick with Start.java unless you really need ot > replicate a tomcat environment :) >>
This isn't going to help either but I've never managed to make even simple web projects work in recent versions of eclipse. I think they broke something when they moved from version 2 to 3. Ian -- Ian Turton Sent from State College, PA, United States ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
