On 10-05-17 2:48 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >> On 10-05-14 12:33 AM, v...@csiro wrote: >>> I have tried those as well. I gave up on the H2 and is currently >>> using the >>> wfs1.1.0 >> >> The only other thing I can think of is that you do not have the h2 >> extension active when you are running the tests. But yeah, the regular >> wfs 1.1.0 configuration works just as well. > > Justin, I tried it out and does not work for me either. > I do have the h2 extension active, but the thing is, the workspaces > in that data dir are an external that picks from > https://svn.codehaus.org/geoserver/branches/2.0.x/data/citewfs-1.1/workspaces Hmmm... strange. I have no idea why it would be pointing there... I wonder if that happened during the switch over to relative externals. > > > which uses a postgis database, not an H2 one... so if the PostGIS > database of the citewfs-1.1 configuration is not up and running, boom. > And if it is, well, you're testing against PostGIS, not against H2. > > Btw, I'm a bit surprised the CITE instructions do not tell people to > use PostGIS for everything WFS... I guess the rationale is that the > WFS 1.0 tests cover PostGIS enough? Well when we did the initial wfs 1.1 compliance postgis was not around for jdbc-ng so I decided to stick with h2. But yeah now that postgis is in and we have a verified configuration we should update the docs to use it. > > Cheers > Andrea > >
-- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
