My wcs1.0 passed when I was testing it. But I am doing a full rebuild now and I will run all test cases again :)
Justin Deoliveira-6 wrote: > > Well actually it seems there are some minor issues with wcs 1.0.0 cite > tests as well :( > > I think i am done working through the issues. I will send email and > commit soon. > > -Justin > > On 10-05-19 8:26 PM, v...@csiro wrote: >> >> That sounds really great, thank you so much Justin :) >> >> I can see the update on the 2.0.2 tag so I am going to do one last build >> and >> test and hopefully get 2.0.2 released today. >> >> If anyone has any objection now is the time to say or hold your silence >> forever :P >> >> >> >> >> Justin Deoliveira-6 wrote: >>> >>> A summary of where we stand on cite issues for wfs 1.1. Most of the >>> failures found by victor were a result of the EntityGeneric layer and >>> svn encoding issues. Basically when I checked it out on the server it >>> somehow ended up with a non UTF encoding so comparisons with other UTF >>> versions of the strings were failing. @Ben: I thought you had a way >>> around this at some point? >>> >>> Anyways, other then that there were two legit failures. Actually these >>> were new cite tests recently added that require GML2 requests to return >>> a mime type with the subtype included, rather than just text/xml. Easy >>> fix. >>> >>> Other then that there are still some issues that are "failing" but I >>> don't consider blockers. They are explained below: >>> >>> * wfs:wfs-1.1.0-Basic-GetFeature-tc42.4 >>> --------------------------------------- >>> >>> fails on postgres versions 8.3 or greater. Been an open issue for quite >>> some time. >>> >>> >>> * wfs:wfs-1.1.0-Basic-GetFeature-tc200.2 >>> ---------------------------------------- >>> >>> I was surprised buy this one. THe issue is that GEoServer complains >>> about a validation failure with the following request: >>> >>> ... >>> <ogc:Filter xmlns:ogc="http://www.opengis.net/ogc"; >>> xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml";> >>> <ogc:BBOX> >>> <gml:Envelope srsName="urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:4326"> >>> <gml:lowerCorner>34 14</gml:lowerCorner> >>> <gml:upperCorner>41 23</gml:upperCorner> >>> </gml:Envelope> >>> </ogc:BBOX> >>> </ogc:Filter> >>> ... >>> >>> I could have sworn that the wfs and filter specs allowed one to leave >>> off the PropertyName in a BBOX filter. But if i look at the filter >>> schema [1] under BBOXType I indeed see that PropertyName is not >>> optional. >>> >>> So it would appear the test is in error here. Patching to include >>> PropertyName it works fine. >>> >>> >>> * wfs:Transaction-idgen-use-existing >>> * wfs:Transaction-idgen-use-existing-update >>> ---------------------------------------- >>> >>> These two tests require that the server accept feature ids from the >>> client which we don't support. I have brought this up on the cite list >>> but have gotten no feedback. But I argue strongly against a WFS >>> supporting this even though there is a plan to implement this in >>> GeoServer regardless. >>> >>> If it is to be supported it has to be something that is settable on a >>> feature type by feature type basis imo. >>> >>> Also these tests were added sometime recently and not really cleared >>> with any of the implementers afaik. If it was it was not made public. >>> >>> So I don't think these should be considered blockers. >>> >>> -Justin >>> >>> [1] http://schemas.opengis.net/filter/1.1.0/filter.xsd >>> >>> -- >>> Justin Deoliveira >>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org >>> Enterprise support for open source geospatial. >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Geoserver-devel mailing list >>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Justin Deoliveira > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Enterprise support for open source geospatial. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/wfs-1.1-cite-test-issues-tp28615908p28616643.html Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
