We may have a version conflict with the tests... are you running hte 
trunk version of the wcs tests from svn? Or an older one that was posted?

On 10-05-19 9:01 PM, v...@csiro wrote:
>
> My wcs1.0 passed when I was testing it. But I am doing a full rebuild now and
> I will run all test cases again :)
>
>
>
>
> Justin Deoliveira-6 wrote:
>>
>> Well actually it seems there are some minor issues with wcs 1.0.0 cite
>> tests as well :(
>>
>> I think i am done working through the issues. I will send email and
>> commit soon.
>>
>> -Justin
>>
>> On 10-05-19 8:26 PM, v...@csiro wrote:
>>>
>>> That sounds really great, thank you so much Justin :)
>>>
>>> I can see the update on the 2.0.2 tag so I am going to do one last build
>>> and
>>> test and hopefully get 2.0.2 released today.
>>>
>>> If anyone has any objection now is the time to say or hold  your silence
>>> forever :P
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Justin Deoliveira-6 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A summary of where we stand on cite issues for wfs 1.1. Most of the
>>>> failures found by victor were a result of the EntityGeneric layer and
>>>> svn encoding issues. Basically when I checked it out on the server it
>>>> somehow ended up with a non UTF encoding so comparisons with other UTF
>>>> versions of the strings were failing. @Ben: I thought you had a way
>>>> around this at some point?
>>>>
>>>> Anyways, other then that there were two legit failures. Actually these
>>>> were new cite tests recently added that require GML2 requests to return
>>>> a mime type with the subtype included, rather than just text/xml. Easy
>>>> fix.
>>>>
>>>> Other then that there are still some issues that are "failing" but I
>>>> don't consider blockers. They are explained below:
>>>>
>>>> * wfs:wfs-1.1.0-Basic-GetFeature-tc42.4
>>>> ---------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> fails on postgres versions 8.3 or greater. Been an open issue for quite
>>>> some time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * wfs:wfs-1.1.0-Basic-GetFeature-tc200.2
>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> I was surprised buy this one. THe issue is that GEoServer complains
>>>> about a validation failure with the following request:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>> <ogc:Filter xmlns:ogc="http://www.opengis.net/ogc";
>>>> xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml";>
>>>>          <ogc:BBOX>
>>>>              <gml:Envelope srsName="urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:4326">
>>>>                <gml:lowerCorner>34 14</gml:lowerCorner>
>>>>                <gml:upperCorner>41 23</gml:upperCorner>
>>>>              </gml:Envelope>
>>>>          </ogc:BBOX>
>>>>        </ogc:Filter>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> I could have sworn that the wfs and filter specs allowed one to leave
>>>> off the PropertyName in a BBOX filter. But if i look at the filter
>>>> schema [1] under BBOXType I indeed see that PropertyName is not
>>>> optional.
>>>>
>>>> So it would appear the test is in error here. Patching to include
>>>> PropertyName it works fine.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * wfs:Transaction-idgen-use-existing
>>>> * wfs:Transaction-idgen-use-existing-update
>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> These two tests require that the server accept feature ids from the
>>>> client which we don't support. I have brought this up on the cite list
>>>> but have gotten no feedback. But I argue strongly against a WFS
>>>> supporting this even though there is a plan to implement this in
>>>> GeoServer regardless.
>>>>
>>>> If it is to be supported it has to be something that is settable on a
>>>> feature type by feature type basis imo.
>>>>
>>>> Also these tests were added sometime recently and not really cleared
>>>> with any of the implementers afaik. If it was it was not made public.
>>>>
>>>> So I don't think these should be considered blockers.
>>>>
>>>> -Justin
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://schemas.opengis.net/filter/1.1.0/filter.xsd
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Justin Deoliveira
>>>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>>>> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>>>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Justin Deoliveira
>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>
>>
>


-- 
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to