Hi Justin,

My last build have everything passing including the wcs1.0.0 and those
errors that you have concluded with the wfs1.1.0

I did see an new error with running the wfs1.1.0 but it is not consistent.
My observation is that it doesn't fail all the time and sometimes when I
execute the test by itself it passes and other time it fails. 

Should we continue with the release? I will do one last update build while
waiting for Ben to give the green light if we do go ahead.

Test wfs:wfs-1.1.0-LockFeature-tc3.1 (View Details): Failed

Request d1e29052_1:
   Method: POST
   URL: http://localhost:8080/geoserver/wfs
   Body: 
<wfs:LockFeature xmlns="http://www.occamlab.com/ctl";
xmlns:ctl="http://www.occamlab.com/ctl";
                 xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml";
                 xmlns:myparsers="http://teamengine.sourceforge.net/parsers";
                 xmlns:ogc="http://www.opengis.net/ogc";
                 xmlns:ows="http://www.opengis.net/ows";
                 xmlns:p="http://teamengine.sourceforge.net/parsers";
                 xmlns:parsers="http://www.occamlab.com/te/parsers";
                 xmlns:saxon="http://saxon.sf.net/";
                 xmlns:sf="http://cite.opengeospatial.org/gmlsf";
                 xmlns:te="http://www.occamlab.com/te";
                 xmlns:tec="java:com.occamlab.te.TECore"
                 xmlns:wfs="http://www.opengis.net/wfs";
                 xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";
                 xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
                 xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
                 xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
                 expiry="5"
                 handle="LockFeature-tc3"
                 lockAction="ALL"
                 service="WFS"
                 version="1.1.0">
   <wfs:Lock handle="lock-1" typeName="sf:EntitéGénérique">
      <ogc:Filter>
         <ogc:BBOX>
            <ogc:PropertyName>sf:attribut.Géométrie</ogc:PropertyName>
            <gml:Envelope srsName="urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:4326">
               <gml:lowerCorner>34.5 -10.0</gml:lowerCorner>
               <gml:upperCorner>72.0 32.0</gml:upperCorner>
            </gml:Envelope>
         </ogc:BBOX>
      </ogc:Filter>
   </wfs:Lock>
</wfs:LockFeature>
   Response from parser p:XMLValidatingParser.GMLSF1:
      <ows:ExceptionReport xmlns:ows="http://www.opengis.net/ows";
                     xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
                     version="1.0.0"
                     xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.opengis.net/ows
http://localhost:8080/geoserver/schemas/ows/1.0.0/owsExceptionReport.xsd";>
  <ows:Exception exceptionCode="NoApplicableCode">
      <ows:ExceptionText>Could not aquire locks
for:net.opengis.wfs.impl.featuresnotlockedtypei...@1fa46c7 (group: null,
featureId: [EntitéGénérique.f004, EntitéGénérique.f007,
EntitéGénérique.f017])</ows:ExceptionText>
  </ows:Exception>
</ows:ExceptionReport>

Message d1e29112_1:
   FAILURE: Expected 2 or more sf:EntitéGénérique instances to be locked
(reported 0)







Justin Deoliveira-6 wrote:
> 
> So at this point all the cite tests are happy except for wms. The issues 
> are quite clearly the combination of the engine and the tests I am 
> trying to run. They blatantly don't work but after much patching of the 
> tests I was able to get most to pass. However there are still some that 
> outright fail with engine failures... not sure what to do at this point, 
> i have submitted the issue to the cite forum and am awaiting a response.
> 
> All that said I don't think this should be a blocker as I think the 
> version of the engine/tests that Victor is running work just fine.
> 
> I also am quite sure that these tests have been added recently so were 
> not there the last time we did cite.
> 
> Anyways, I will let the powers at be make the call but I would say cite 
> is probably good enough to go for a release.
> 
> -Justin
> 
> -- 
> Justin Deoliveira
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/cite-test-status-tp28616849p28616937.html
Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to