Consulted Ben and we are going go ahead with the release based on the success
hudson has on it cite testing.




v...@csiro wrote:
> 
> Hi Justin,
> 
> My last build have everything passing including the wcs1.0.0 and those
> errors that you have concluded with the wfs1.1.0
> 
> I did see an new error with running the wfs1.1.0 but it is not consistent.
> My observation is that it doesn't fail all the time and sometimes when I
> execute the test by itself it passes and other time it fails. 
> 
> Should we continue with the release? I will do one last update build while
> waiting for Ben to give the green light if we do go ahead.
> 
> Test wfs:wfs-1.1.0-LockFeature-tc3.1 (View Details): Failed
> 
> Request d1e29052_1:
>    Method: POST
>    URL: http://localhost:8080/geoserver/wfs
>    Body: 
> <wfs:LockFeature xmlns="http://www.occamlab.com/ctl";
> xmlns:ctl="http://www.occamlab.com/ctl";
>                  xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml";
>                 
> xmlns:myparsers="http://teamengine.sourceforge.net/parsers";
>                  xmlns:ogc="http://www.opengis.net/ogc";
>                  xmlns:ows="http://www.opengis.net/ows";
>                  xmlns:p="http://teamengine.sourceforge.net/parsers";
>                  xmlns:parsers="http://www.occamlab.com/te/parsers";
>                  xmlns:saxon="http://saxon.sf.net/";
>                  xmlns:sf="http://cite.opengeospatial.org/gmlsf";
>                  xmlns:te="http://www.occamlab.com/te";
>                  xmlns:tec="java:com.occamlab.te.TECore"
>                  xmlns:wfs="http://www.opengis.net/wfs";
>                  xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";
>                  xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
>                  xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
>                  xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
>                  expiry="5"
>                  handle="LockFeature-tc3"
>                  lockAction="ALL"
>                  service="WFS"
>                  version="1.1.0">
>    <wfs:Lock handle="lock-1" typeName="sf:EntitéGénérique">
>       <ogc:Filter>
>          <ogc:BBOX>
>             <ogc:PropertyName>sf:attribut.Géométrie</ogc:PropertyName>
>             <gml:Envelope srsName="urn:x-ogc:def:crs:EPSG:4326">
>                <gml:lowerCorner>34.5 -10.0</gml:lowerCorner>
>                <gml:upperCorner>72.0 32.0</gml:upperCorner>
>             </gml:Envelope>
>          </ogc:BBOX>
>       </ogc:Filter>
>    </wfs:Lock>
> </wfs:LockFeature>
>    Response from parser p:XMLValidatingParser.GMLSF1:
>       <ows:ExceptionReport xmlns:ows="http://www.opengis.net/ows";
>                      xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
>                      version="1.0.0"
>                      xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.opengis.net/ows
> http://localhost:8080/geoserver/schemas/ows/1.0.0/owsExceptionReport.xsd";>
>   <ows:Exception exceptionCode="NoApplicableCode">
>       <ows:ExceptionText>Could not aquire locks
> for:net.opengis.wfs.impl.featuresnotlockedtypei...@1fa46c7 (group: null,
> featureId: [EntitéGénérique.f004, EntitéGénérique.f007,
> EntitéGénérique.f017])</ows:ExceptionText>
>   </ows:Exception>
> </ows:ExceptionReport>
> 
> Message d1e29112_1:
>    FAILURE: Expected 2 or more sf:EntitéGénérique instances to be locked
> (reported 0)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Justin Deoliveira-6 wrote:
>> 
>> So at this point all the cite tests are happy except for wms. The issues 
>> are quite clearly the combination of the engine and the tests I am 
>> trying to run. They blatantly don't work but after much patching of the 
>> tests I was able to get most to pass. However there are still some that 
>> outright fail with engine failures... not sure what to do at this point, 
>> i have submitted the issue to the cite forum and am awaiting a response.
>> 
>> All that said I don't think this should be a blocker as I think the 
>> version of the engine/tests that Victor is running work just fine.
>> 
>> I also am quite sure that these tests have been added recently so were 
>> not there the last time we did cite.
>> 
>> Anyways, I will let the powers at be make the call but I would say cite 
>> is probably good enough to go for a release.
>> 
>> -Justin
>> 
>> -- 
>> Justin Deoliveira
>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/cite-test-status-tp28616849p28617028.html
Sent from the GeoServer - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to