I use ECQL in uDig and have had no troubles; Gabriel has an open bug about the use of the "IN" keyword to check feature id. I would like to see that resolved as it is the only thing outstanding likely to result in a grammar change.
Jody On 27/05/2010, at 1:21 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >> Makes sense. As I understand it CQL is a subset of ECQL correct? So >> nothing "protocol" wise has to change? > > That is my understanding as well. Here: > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/ECQL+Parser+Design > > Btw, as far as stability goes it seems ECQL has the same level > of unit testing as CQL. Just not sure about real world testing. > > Mauricio, has ECQL been used in real world applications for a while? > I sure don't see many changes in the EQL code in the last year, > which might be a either sign of very good stability, or that not many > people are using it ;-) > > Cheers > Andrea > > > > -- > Andrea Aime > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Expert service straight from the developers. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
