On Wednesday 26 May 2010 05:21:27 pm Andrea Aime wrote: > Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > > Makes sense. As I understand it CQL is a subset of ECQL correct? So > > nothing "protocol" wise has to change? > > That is my understanding as well. Here: > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/ECQL+Parser+Design > > Btw, as far as stability goes it seems ECQL has the same level > of unit testing as CQL. Just not sure about real world testing. > > Mauricio, has ECQL been used in real world applications for a while?
I can not reply seriously this question. Jody was very interested to do this extension, maybe he know or can mention some real applications. > I sure don't see many changes in the EQL code in the last year, > which might be a either sign of very good stability, or that not many > people are using it ;-) :D. Well, my personal experience say me that if a product do not work correctly you will see a storm of mails, telephone calls, etc. The sea looks fine around CQL. Analysing the constructive strategy, ECQL is reusing the CQL code, I want to say that the error probability in ECQL is very low. > > Cheers > Andrea cheers -- Mauricio Pazos www.axios.es ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
