Hi Christian, sounds like a very interesting project.

I would be ok with moving to Spring 3.0, may be we can just schedule
that for geoserver 2.2.x. I'm not sure when we'll push for a 2.1 release
but hopefully it won't be that long.
If at all, a minimal assessment of the incompatibilities and an
estimation of the effort required would be very much appreciated.I'll
try to give it a read to the Spring migration guide, but probably moving
to Spring 3 also means migrating the web app from wicket 1.3 to 1.4?
I don't think it's gonna be a small task, but worthwhile one.

Best regards,
Gabriel

On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 13:54 +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> About Spring 3.0, taken from Spring Security FAQ
> ********************************************
> What Java and Spring Framework versions are required?
> 
> 
> Spring Security 2.0.x requires a minimum JDK version of 1.4 and is  
> built against Spring 2.0.x. It should also be compatible with  
> applications using Spring 2.5.x.
> 
> Spring Security 3.0 requires JDK 1.5 as a minimum and will also  
> require Spring 3.0.
> ********************************************
> 
> I think, we currently use Spring 2.5.5 ?
> 
> A migration guide is here
> http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/upgrade/spring3/html/
> 
> I think if we want geoserver security on a professional level,  I  
> should study the guide and try to migrate. If you feel that this is a  
> big risk, I have to fall back and use Spring Security 2.0.
> 
> And btw, thank you for your backup offer.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
> environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security 
> easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the 
> two and get a better understanding.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

-- 
Gabriel Roldan
[email protected]
Expert service straight from the developers


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security 
easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the 
two and get a better understanding.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to