Since I have no idea about the impact of using Spring 3.0, we could do a smaller step and integrate Spring Security 2.0. This should be possible without taking to much risk. Would be an option, I do not want to wait until next year for Spring 3.0 because I have a time frame (12 month max, starting soon)
Quoting Gabriel Roldán <[email protected]>: > Hi Christian, sounds like a very interesting project. > > I would be ok with moving to Spring 3.0, may be we can just schedule > that for geoserver 2.2.x. I'm not sure when we'll push for a 2.1 release > but hopefully it won't be that long. > If at all, a minimal assessment of the incompatibilities and an > estimation of the effort required would be very much appreciated.I'll > try to give it a read to the Spring migration guide, but probably moving > to Spring 3 also means migrating the web app from wicket 1.3 to 1.4? > I don't think it's gonna be a small task, but worthwhile one. > > Best regards, > Gabriel > > On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 13:54 +0200, [email protected] wrote: >> About Spring 3.0, taken from Spring Security FAQ >> ******************************************** >> What Java and Spring Framework versions are required? >> >> >> Spring Security 2.0.x requires a minimum JDK version of 1.4 and is >> built against Spring 2.0.x. It should also be compatible with >> applications using Spring 2.5.x. >> >> Spring Security 3.0 requires JDK 1.5 as a minimum and will also >> require Spring 3.0. >> ******************************************** >> >> I think, we currently use Spring 2.5.5 ? >> >> A migration guide is here >> http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/upgrade/spring3/html/ >> >> I think if we want geoserver security on a professional level, I >> should study the guide and try to migrate. If you feel that this is a >> big risk, I have to fall back and use Spring Security 2.0. >> >> And btw, thank you for your backup offer. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized >> environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security >> easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the >> two and get a better understanding. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d >> _______________________________________________ >> Geoserver-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > > -- > Gabriel Roldan > [email protected] > Expert service straight from the developers > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the two and get a better understanding. http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
