I am currently working on replacing acegi security with spring security 2.0.6
Most of the time I have to replace the term "acegi" with a spring security term. (import statements, class names,...). This requires modifying a lot of files resulting in a big patch. Additionally I have seen that geoserver code itself uses the term "acegi". (package names, parameter names). The question is: Should i also rename the geoserver "acegi" elements resulting in a bigger patch to be consistent or or should I rename only the necessary elements. ? Christian ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Next 800 Companies to Lead America's Growth: New Video Whitepaper David G. Thomson, author of the best-selling book "Blueprint to a Billion" shares his insights and actions to help propel your business during the next growth cycle. Listen Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/SAP-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
