On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Justin Deoliveira <jdeol...@opengeo.org> wrote: > Page updated with modules I care about. And question... are we going to > outright remove the modules from svn... or move them to some other space > outside the source tree. Reason being that there are a few in there that I > probably don't want to delete outright.. but wouldn't mind if they were > outside the source tree. Modules that i probably won't compile any time soon > but if i want to look up something as a reference don't want to really go > hunting through the svn repository either.
If they are not recent we could just remove them from 2.1.x and trunk and leave them on 2.0.x? If they are recent I guess we could leave them only on trunk or something like that, and clean them up later if it needs be? What worries me about moving them "outside" is that they lose the connection with the branch they were meant to be buildable into. Cheers Andrea -- ------------------------------------------------------- Ing. Andrea Aime GeoSolutions S.A.S. Tech lead Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 962313 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime http://twitter.com/geowolf ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
