On 02/12/2012 02:56 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Gabriel Roldan <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Yet that's still the danger wrt disk usage, and where disk quota
    and min/max cached zoom levels come to play [1].
    Yeah, you won't have exactly a static tile cache, but you need to
    make some compromises when disk usage is a concern.


Hmm.. so far I've hit few cases where the disk usage is not a concern, more often than not the area that one needs to depict seems to grow faster than the ability to buy disk for it (meaning, local data handlers often cannot afford a serious NAS, and those that do often have continents to deal with, at that point the NAS are small anyways... and disk quota does not cluster, making GWC not usable in those cases
since HA is a requirement ... )

Well, we're not pre-seeding, and our pyramids only go down to.. I think ZL14. Even those images are pretty small since the resolution of our data is only 35 geohash bits. And yes, I think we have disk quota set. Mostly the use of GWC is there to speed up reloading of recently-viewed layers within a short span of time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to