> We want to do further development based on geoserver,and we will have to
> implement the Web Feature Service Gazetteer service, however I can not find
> the difference between them evenn I read the starands from OGC.
It is a "profile" of wfs that describes a specific set of featureTypes you need
to publish.
> Then I got no idea how to start my work.
I recently bid on some similar work, my research showed that the wfs-g profile
was using an old version of the WFS specification (and thus would need to be
updated to work). Talk to the wfs-g authors[1] to see what the progress is on
that. If not you will need to do it yourself.
You then have a couple of implementation options:
a) use app-schema to map from your data model to the target schemas provided by
wfs-g.
b) role your own data store in order to optimise performance / minimise risk
In general the wfs-g profile was nice and small and would make a good
"showcase" of app-schema support (since the domain of addresses is easily
understood).
> I think people in this list may be familar with the ogc web service.
You should check in with the OGC email lists as well.
Jody
[1] http://www.opengeospatial.org/projects/groups/wfsgaz1.0swg
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
