So we're at 5 votes, all +1, can we call it accepted?

On 2 May 2014 17:14, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Kevin, hoaxing those as part of the proposal makes it more real for
> people who come to implement a security filter later. These GSIP proposals
> form our GeoServer "design documentation" such as it is ...
>
> Jody Garnett
>
>
> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Kevin Smith <ksm...@boundlessgeo.com>wrote:
>
>> OK, here are some examples for Jody,
>>
>> AllowAllResourceAccessManager which just allows access to everything
>> would have a getSecurityFilter like this
>>
>> public Filter getSecurityFilter(Authentication user, Class<? extends
>> CatalogInfo> clazz) {
>>     return Predicates.allowAll();
>> }
>>
>> While WorkspaceCatalogFilter which hides one specific workspace might
>> have a getSecurityFilter like this:
>>
>> public Filter getSecurityFilter(Class<? extends CatalogInfo> clazz) {
>>     if(WorkspaceInfo.class.isAssignableFrom(clazz)) {
>>         return Predicates.not(Predicates.equals("id", workspace.getId()));
>>     } else {
>>         return Predicates.not(Predicates.equals("workspace.id",
>> workspace.getId()));
>>     }
>> }
>>
>> This isn't actually in the proposal but is in my implementation;
>> AbstractResourceAccessManager and AbstractCatalogFilter provide
>> implementations equivalent to the existing filter. They are implemented
>> based on calls to other methods of the RAM or CF that require the
>> deserialized CatalogInfo object, and hence not are not "well known" filters
>> that JDBCConfig can handle.  Overriding them allows for the RAM or CF to
>> replace that with a well known filter if it can, or to call super for cases
>> where it can't.
>>
>> This is how I implemented it for DataAccessManagerAdapter
>>
>>     @SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
>>     @Override
>>     public Filter getSecurityFilter(Authentication user,
>>             Class<? extends CatalogInfo> clazz) {
>>
>>         if(delegate.getMode()==CatalogMode.CHALLENGE)
>>             // If we're in CHALLENGE mode, everything should be visible
>>             return Predicates.acceptAll();
>>         else
>>             return super.toFilter(user, clazz);
>>     }
>>
>> It returns a well known filter when that's possible, and falls back to
>> the non well known default when it can't.
>>
>>
>> On 1 May 2014 05:30, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry I was getting confused with the geotools page -
>>> http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/procedures/proposal.html
>>>
>>> Which has an elapsed time of 15 days - I thought we had a similar
>>> mechanism in place for GeoServer to prevent proposals being stalled.
>>>
>>>  Jody Garnett
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Andrea Aime <
>>> andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yeah two weeks is our grace period, so you can assume the remaining
>>>>> votes are +0
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jody, where is the two weeks coming from? Here is the official policy:
>>>> http://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/developer/policies/gsip.html
>>>>
>>>> I agree two weeks wait is long enough, if not too long, but the only
>>>> measure of success
>>>> we have in there is:
>>>> "The proposal is considered successful after a majority of positive
>>>> votes is a achieved and all feedback from any negative votes has been
>>>> addressed"
>>>>
>>>> When things settle down I normally go for the opposite question: "If
>>>> nobody
>>>> has further feedback I'll got ahead and merge the work tomorrow/in x
>>>> days"
>>>> Works well in a world of busy people that might simply not respond
>>>> mails :-p
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Andrea
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ==
>>>> Meet us at GEO Business 2014! in London! Visit http://goo.gl/fES3aK
>>>> for more information.
>>>> ==
>>>>
>>>> Ing. Andrea Aime
>>>> @geowolf
>>>> Technical Lead
>>>>
>>>> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
>>>> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
>>>> 55054  Massarosa (LU)
>>>> Italy
>>>> phone: +39 0584 962313
>>>> fax: +39 0584 1660272
>>>> mob: +39  339 8844549
>>>>
>>>> http://www.geo-solutions.it
>>>> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Kevin Smith
>>
>> Junior Software Engineer | Boundless
>>
>> ksm...@boundlessgeo.com
>>
>> +1-778-785-7459
>>
>> @boundlessgeo <https://twitter.com/boundlessgeo>
>>
>
>


-- 

Kevin Smith

Junior Software Engineer | Boundless

ksm...@boundlessgeo.com

+1-778-785-7459

@boundlessgeo <https://twitter.com/boundlessgeo>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to