I would rather expose the file name than start hacking it up, it seems this
is a bug that could be fixed with impact then changing file names.
If we had to start hacking it up we may as well consider it not editable on
the file system and then embedded just the style part we use in our
xstream.
It is not like we use a full SLD to configure an entire map of layers,
usually we only do one style for one layer.
On Saturday, May 31, 2014, Andrea Aime <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
> as described in http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5545
> there are situations in which we can get two styles "related" in such
> a way that if you modify one, you'll modify the other as well.
>
> I proposed a solution... one year ago, and tried to get some feedback
> for the past month, without success, so I'm turning this to the dev list.
>
> The idea would be to append a progressive number to the files
> in case of conflict, so that the link between the style name and the
> file is kept apparent, as people sometimes edit those files directly,
> but without exposing the filenames to the general population of users
>
> Feedback?
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> --
> ==
> Meet us at GEO Business 2014! in London! Visit http://goo.gl/fES3aK
> for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> 55054 Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax: +39 0584 1660272
> mob: +39 339 8844549
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
--
Jody Garnett
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes.
www.restlet.com/download
http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
