On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]>
wrote:
> I would rather expose the file name than start hacking it up, it seems
> this is a bug that could be fixed with impact then changing file names.
I find it really ugly... from the user point of view the style is one, it
has a name and a body,
the fact there are two files is really an accident of implementation. Plus,
once exposed, it's hard to remove
>
> If we had to start hacking it up we may as well consider it not editable
> on the file system and then embedded just the style part we use in our
> xstream.
>
That would be better imho... but I guess it's something we can do only on
trunk right?
Another angle we can look at this, is that the "mistake" is that we let the
people rename the style
without renaming the associated sld file, the reason the issue happens is
that they can drift apart
from each other.
>
> It is not like we use a full SLD to configure an entire map of layers,
> usually we only do one style for one layer.
>
Leave the usually out, the only way to define a map with SLD is to make a
GetMap request with no layers and styles,
but only the SLD (as reference, or sld_body), indeed, all we need out of a
SLD file is first UserStyle, everything
else is ignored.
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
Meet us at GEO Business 2014! in London! Visit http://goo.gl/fES3aK
for more information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes.
www.restlet.com/download
http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
