On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Daniele Romagnoli <
[email protected]> wrote:
> - virtual (a "virtual" coverage made of other bands as GDAL Virtual raster
> is made of other rasters)
> - composite (a coverage been composed of other bands as simple selections
> or more complex combinations as per future improvements)
> - computed (a coverage having bands being computed on top of other bands,
> where the computation may be a simple selection as well as a more complex
> math as per future improvements).
>
>
I still like virtual better, composite is wrong long term, computed makes
me think only about
doing actual calculations.
If we want to draw a parallel, this functionality is the equivalent of sql
view for vector data,
so we could also call them "coverage views"
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
