On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote:
> That is where we ended up (again) ... so good that you are happy.
>
> One thing you may be able to speak to is the suffix to prevent name
> clashes - it looks like this is only to untangle updating an old catalog.
> Is there any way we can confine that logic to *just* the upgrade process
> (and thus have an easier validation story to tell when renaming styles).
>
Old is relative. In this case, any data dir in 2.x format is affected, and
the upgrade process is available only for the 1.7.x data dirs so... no can
do
Cheers
Andrea
--
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/NWWaa2 for more information.
==
Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39 339 8844549
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
