Yeah this is why we requested help testing RC1 :( I am not sure if I should "release" a nightly, or checkout 2.6.0, apply the one fix (anyone have a link) and call it 2.6.1.
Jody Jody Garnett On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Richard Duivenvoorde <rdmaili...@duif.net> wrote: > On 23-10-14 16:57, Andrea Aime wrote: > > n Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Richard Duivenvoorde > > We upgraded to 2.6.0 (and still doing fine :-) ), but Oracle layers > > performance is much lower compared to 2.4.3 > > > > Can somebody help me with this, or confirm behaviour like this? > > > > Yes, we know, we have a fix. Can you try 2.6.x nightlies? > > http://ares.boundlessgeo.com/geoserver/2.6.x/ > > Ouch, yes, that is better... see the log.txt attached. > > Good that it is fixed, should have test this here earlier :-( > > Any planning for a 2.6.1 release ? > > Thanks, > > Richard Duivenvoorde > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
