I do not want to get too hung up on words, the quick take is the PSC does
not have enough capacity to review the proposal at the moment so we should
wait. The GeoServer process does not have a time limit like the GeoTools
one.
I like +0 and -0 as that provides a way for people who have not had time to
provide their "rough feeling" about the topic.
--
Jody Garnett
On 14 January 2016 at 14:05, Ben Caradoc-Davies <b...@transient.nz> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> the PSC page (which differs from the GSIP page) lists:
> http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/policies/psc.html
>
> +1 : For
> -1 : Against
> +0: Mildly for, but mostly indifferent
> -0: Mildly against, but mostly indifferent
>
> What is unclear is whether +0 is considered positive. The GSIP procedure
> mentions only 0 so there is no ambiguity:
> http://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/policies/gsip.html
>
> Kind regards,
> Ben.
>
> On 15/01/16 10:59, Chris Snider wrote:
>
>> I am curious about this:
>> +1 = Positive (we should do this)
>> +0 = Abstains (won't/can't vote one way or another, possibly due to lack
>> of information or time to study the proposal)
>> -1 = Negative (we should NOT do this)
>>
>> This kind of the thoughts for the various votes?
>>
>> Chris Snider
>> Senior Software Engineer
>> Intelligent Software Solutions, Inc.
>>
>
> --
> Ben Caradoc-Davies <b...@transient.nz>
> Director
> Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/>
> New Zealand
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
