Jody, I also like +0/-0, but I think that these votes should be counted as the same.
As the PSC has grown (in terms of active members), was it our intent that we need more +1 votes to accept a GSIP to reach a majority? One consequence is that this GSIP was in effect rejected by the 0 votes of voting members who did not oppose the proposal, diluting the majority that the GSIP had achieved before Jody encouraged PSC members to vote (which was a good thing in itself). If these 0-voting PSC members had ignored the vote, the GSIP would have been accepted. This GSIP was rejected by diligent conformance to process. We might consider changing the process success to define success by (for example) three +1 votes and no -1 votes, like the rules for GeoTools commit access (but with only PSC members voting). Should change require support from a minimum number of PSC members, or should change as is now the case require active support from a (simple) majority of the PSC? Kind regards, Ben. On 16/01/16 06:02, Jody Garnett wrote: > I do not want to get too hung up on words, the quick take is the PSC does > not have enough capacity to review the proposal at the moment so we should > wait. The GeoServer process does not have a time limit like the GeoTools > one. > > I like +0 and -0 as that provides a way for people who have not had time to > provide their "rough feeling" about the topic. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <b...@transient.nz> Director Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/> New Zealand ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
