What is your opinion on the dependency concern?
What do you think of having the new module be called "task manager" or
something like that.
Although it will contain a quite a bit of task implementation that
regards remote data management specifically. Should I add two new
modules though :/
Regards
Niels
On 30-05-17 04:05, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
On 30/05/17 00:55, Niels Charlier wrote:
Therefore, logically, it would be importer that needs be modified to be
built on top of my API rather than me building on top of importer.
This sounds like a great option. A modest investment in refactoring
now will save us the future maintenance overhead introduced by
duplication. (And I speak us someone currently fixing my own
ill-considered DataUtilities duplication from five years ago.)
Kind regards,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
