(Writing from mobile) Personally I've never learned the new prefixes, but
agree the current situation is messy, so a tiepid +1.
Were the old process names deprecated also documentations wise, and
examples using them removed?
In other words, was warning given to users?
I think we have kept using the old names in Geosolutions but I'm not sure,
hopefully some of my colleagues will chime in.
Also, remember that ticket you opened about startup failures if a process
plugin gets removed? What happens on upgrade for existing installations?
Thinking out loud, would it make sense to stop advertising the old process
names, but still support them, and log a warning pointing at the new name?
Cheers
Andrea
Il dom 22 lug 2018, 09:49 Ian Turton <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> One thing I keep having to explain to users is the reason we have so many
> duplicated processes in the WPS. Would it be a good idea to remove the
> deprecated ones before we release 2.14?
>
> As I understand it, there will be no fewer actual processes just fewer
> prefixes.
>
> I'm happy to do the work if people are happy with the idea.
>
> Ian
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
