I set a couple targets on the GSIP-176, however they are only a wild-guess (as we would still need anyone to respond to an RFP call).
I have updated the GSIP page to make the target/progress more clear: - baseline: 5000 budget from osgeo - target 1: 10000 funding raising - target 2: 15000 funding target Basically if we do not meet the first target 1 I do not think the PSC should bother issuing an RFP. By the same token if we get a bunch of proposals in outside of our range we may not proceed. I had several chats on this subject at foss4g many groups were hopeful of skipping cite compatibility for WFS/WMS/WCS/WPS and wanting to focus on openapi. While I like the enthusiasm it will be some time yet before those standards are ready, and even when they are we would like to keep supporting WFS/WFS/WCS/WPS. -- Jody Garnett On Mon, 16 Sep 2019 at 06:37, Ilya Rosenfeld <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Jody. I’m curious, under ideal circumstances, what budget is > required to get it fully under control and implemented? In other words if > we were to set a fundraising target, what would be a solid number? > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 15, 2019, at 10:32 PM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for your hustle on this Ilya, adding you the blog.geoserver.org > now. > > While we did mention this challenge during the state of geoserver > presentation we did not linger on the fundraising aspect. > -- > Jody Garnett > > > On Sun, 15 Sep 2019 at 12:09, Ilya Rosenfeld <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Greetings - >> >> As some of you probably know, I took it upon myself to raise awareness >> and try to drum up some funding for the CITE testing automation initiative >> on LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/join-me-funding-important-geoserver-initiative-ilya-rosenfeld/>. >> It was gratifying to see all the positive response expressed in Likes and >> re-shares, but unfortunately that didn't produce much funding. (Other than >> my own, I think there was only one more contribution made via PayPal that >> was set up specifically for this.) So perhaps a subsequent tactic to keep >> the ball rolling is to leverage the first wave of response, publish a guest >> blog post on GeoServer site (per Jody's idea) and socialize via Twitter. >> I'm happy to adapt the original post if need-be and provide content for the >> blog. >> >> BTW going forward, I'm also happy to help managing this initiative to >> completion. I sincerely believe it's a very important one and certainly >> have the quals to help. >> >> Cheers >> Ilya Rosenfeld >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Geoserver-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >> >
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
