Thanks Andrea, I will rename the proposal. I have capacity to support the wps module on this one (as indeed a customer is funding this activity).
Jody On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 5:11 AM Andrea Aime < andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote: > Hi Jody, > checking the proposal, I believe the title is misleading, it seems to > suggest a classic module move from community to extension, as is... which > does not match the actual proposal. > The actual proposal is: > > - Fold the WFS output format gs-wfs, the WMS output format in gs-wms, > hence, move these two bits in _core_ > - Fold the WPS process in gs-wps-core > > About the move to cover of the WMS/WFS output formats, from a technical > point of view I'm not concerned: > > - The WFS output format will eventually break for large outputs due to > HTTP time outs (needs to be written on disk first, streamed back once > complete), but the same already happens for zipped shapefiles, so nothing > really new > - The WMS output format now honors the rendering time outs, so it > should be fine > > I should however point out that the core of GeoServer is "maintained by > the PSC" so the rest of the PSC should be comfortable having that code in > core, and realize the associated obligation. > > About the move of the WPS process to wps-core, I'm also personally not > deeply concerned, if the documentation > is very clear about the experimental extensions baked into the process (so > doc updates are needed). > I'm however noting the code moving also moves its maintainership from > "nobody" to me (the WPS module maintainer), which I'm not too fond of [1]. > > Since you're making the proposal, I'd like you to step up as co-maintainer > of the code you're trying to push up. For the core bits, as a PSC member, > you're taking that > responsibility automatically anyways. Please step up to co-maintain the > processes once moved in gs-wps-core. > > Cheers > Andrea > > [1] Due to both project and business obligations I'm responsible for way > too many modules already, > something which is too big of a onus on my shoulders, and a big project > liability in case I get sick > or decide to leave. It's something we'll have to address, possibly sooner > rather than later. > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 5:28 AM Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Please have a look at >> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-206 which outlines >> moving different sections of the geopackage community module into the >> appropriate core module: gs-wfs, gs-wms, and gs-wps. >> >> The proposal is solid, please make note of the backwards compatibility >> section which proposes calling out wps geopackage supports for not yet >> finalized extensions. While there is nothing wrong with having geoserver >> specific extensions they should be documented as such (and marked as in >> progress if they are chasing a moving target). If folks feel strongly >> about documentation not being enough warning I can look at leaving these >> geopackage extensions as an optional install. >> >> Jody >> -- >> -- >> Jody Garnett >> > _______________________________________________ >> Geoserver-devel mailing list >> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >> > > > -- > > Regards, > > Andrea Aime > > == > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! > > Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information. > == > > Ing. Andrea Aime > @geowolf > Technical Lead > > GeoSolutions Group > phone: +39 0584 962313 > > fax: +39 0584 1660272 > > mob: +39 333 8128928 > > https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/ > > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE > 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si > precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo > contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è > riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il > messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra > operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. > > This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is > addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or > otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by > European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this > e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please > notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail > -- -- Jody Garnett
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
