Proposal is renamed. With respect to gs-wps module I would like to see the matching gt-wps unsupported module which forms its foundation cleaned up (finally). Something we can discuss in the new year. -- Jody Garnett
On Thu, 30 Dec 2021 at 07:40, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Andrea, I will rename the proposal. > > I have capacity to support the wps module on this one (as indeed a > customer is funding this activity). > > Jody > > On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 5:11 AM Andrea Aime < > andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote: > >> Hi Jody, >> checking the proposal, I believe the title is misleading, it seems to >> suggest a classic module move from community to extension, as is... which >> does not match the actual proposal. >> The actual proposal is: >> >> - Fold the WFS output format gs-wfs, the WMS output format in gs-wms, >> hence, move these two bits in _core_ >> - Fold the WPS process in gs-wps-core >> >> About the move to cover of the WMS/WFS output formats, from a technical >> point of view I'm not concerned: >> >> - The WFS output format will eventually break for large outputs due >> to HTTP time outs (needs to be written on disk first, streamed back once >> complete), but the same already happens for zipped shapefiles, so nothing >> really new >> - The WMS output format now honors the rendering time outs, so it >> should be fine >> >> I should however point out that the core of GeoServer is "maintained by >> the PSC" so the rest of the PSC should be comfortable having that code in >> core, and realize the associated obligation. >> >> About the move of the WPS process to wps-core, I'm also personally not >> deeply concerned, if the documentation >> is very clear about the experimental extensions baked into the process >> (so doc updates are needed). >> I'm however noting the code moving also moves its maintainership from >> "nobody" to me (the WPS module maintainer), which I'm not too fond of [1]. >> >> Since you're making the proposal, I'd like you to step up as >> co-maintainer of the code you're trying to push up. For the core bits, as a >> PSC member, you're taking that >> responsibility automatically anyways. Please step up to co-maintain the >> processes once moved in gs-wps-core. >> >> Cheers >> Andrea >> >> [1] Due to both project and business obligations I'm responsible for way >> too many modules already, >> something which is too big of a onus on my shoulders, and a big project >> liability in case I get sick >> or decide to leave. It's something we'll have to address, possibly sooner >> rather than later. >> >> On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 5:28 AM Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Please have a look at >>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-206 which outlines >>> moving different sections of the geopackage community module into the >>> appropriate core module: gs-wfs, gs-wms, and gs-wps. >>> >>> The proposal is solid, please make note of the backwards compatibility >>> section which proposes calling out wps geopackage supports for not yet >>> finalized extensions. While there is nothing wrong with having geoserver >>> specific extensions they should be documented as such (and marked as in >>> progress if they are chasing a moving target). If folks feel strongly >>> about documentation not being enough warning I can look at leaving these >>> geopackage extensions as an optional install. >>> >>> Jody >>> -- >>> -- >>> Jody Garnett >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> Geoserver-devel mailing list >>> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Regards, >> >> Andrea Aime >> >> == >> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! >> >> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information. >> == >> >> Ing. Andrea Aime >> @geowolf >> Technical Lead >> >> GeoSolutions Group >> phone: +39 0584 962313 >> >> fax: +39 0584 1660272 >> >> mob: +39 333 8128928 >> >> https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/ >> >> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. >> UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si >> precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo >> contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è >> riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il >> messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra >> operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. >> >> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is >> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or >> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by >> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this >> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended >> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please >> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail >> > -- > -- > Jody Garnett >
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
