+1 for both GSIP-311 and GSIP-312.

-Jukka Rahkonen-

Lähettäjä: Niels Charlier via Geoserver-devel 
<geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Lähetetty: torstai 21. huhtikuuta 2022 12.01
Vastaanottaja: Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
Kopio: Geoserver-devel <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Aihe: Re: [Geoserver-devel] proposals: promote metadata and csw-iso to 
extensions


Hello everyone,

So if I get it right GSIP-311 has sufficient votes (three +1, no -1), but 
GSIP-312 doesn't (no -1, but only two +1). Does anyone else still want to add a 
vote?

Kind Regards

Niels
On 05/04/2022 05:42, Jody Garnett wrote:
Hey Niels!

Not quite sure I understand the CLA question; if you did the work on behalf of 
a particular government department and had their permission/authority to donate 
to OSGeo then you should be good. If you are really interested in being careful 
you could ask the manager (whoever paid you or authorized the work) to sign a 
"Corporate contributor 
license<https://www.osgeo.org/wp-content/uploads/corporate_contributor.pdf>", 
and name the body of the work (metadata and csw-iso) as the contributed work in 
"Schedule B" at the bottom of the document.

Although it says "corporate" it is really:

​"You" (or "Your") shall mean the copyright owner or legal entity authorized by 
the copyright owner that is making this Agreement with the Foundation. "You" 
(or "Your") shall mean the copyright owner or legal entity authorized by the 
copyright owner that is making this Agreement with the Foundation.

So a government should be able to sign it.
--
Jody Garnett

On Apr 4, 2022 at 4:49:08 AM, Niels Charlier via Geoserver-devel 
<geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>>
 wrote:
Hello,

I have written up two proposals to promote community modules "metadata"
and "csw-iso" to extensions.

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-311

https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-312

I believe stability, test coverage, users, are all okay. Please discuss.

One question about copyrights though: the metadata module was mostly
written by me (who signed CLA) as part of a contract particular
government department. I believe they technically have copyrights, and
agreed to open source it. What would be required though? Should they
sign CLA for businesses?

Kind Regards

Niels



_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to