Thank you, Jukka!

Can I assume then that the absent votes are +0 and that both proposals are accepted?

Kind Regards

Niels

On 21/04/2022 12:39, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote:

+1 for both GSIP-311 and GSIP-312.

-Jukka Rahkonen-

*Lähettäjä:* Niels Charlier via Geoserver-devel <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
*Lähetetty:* torstai 21. huhtikuuta 2022 12.01
*Vastaanottaja:* Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
*Kopio:* Geoserver-devel <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
*Aihe:* Re: [Geoserver-devel] proposals: promote metadata and csw-iso to extensions

Hello everyone,

So if I get it right GSIP-311 has sufficient votes (three +1, no -1), but GSIP-312 doesn't (no -1, but only two +1). Does anyone else still want to add a vote?

Kind Regards

Niels

On 05/04/2022 05:42, Jody Garnett wrote:

    Hey Niels!

    Not quite sure I understand the CLA question; if you did the work
    on behalf of a particular government department and had their
    permission/authority to donate to OSGeo then you should be good.
    If you are really interested in being careful you could ask the
    manager (whoever paid you or authorized the work) to sign a
    "Corporate contributor license
    <https://www.osgeo.org/wp-content/uploads/corporate_contributor.pdf>",
    and name the body of the work (metadata and csw-iso) as the
    contributed work in "Schedule B" at the bottom of the document.

    Although it says "corporate" it is really:

        ​"You" (or "Your") shall mean the copyright owner or legal
        entity authorized by the copyright owner that is making this
        Agreement with the Foundation. "You" (or "Your") shall mean
        the copyright owner or legal entity authorized by the
        copyright owner that is making this Agreement with the
        Foundation.

    So a government should be able to sign it.

    --

    Jody Garnett


    On Apr 4, 2022 at 4:49:08 AM, Niels Charlier via Geoserver-devel
    <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:

        Hello,

        I have written up two proposals to promote community modules
        "metadata"
        and "csw-iso" to extensions.

        https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-311

        https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-312

        I believe stability, test coverage, users, are all okay.
        Please discuss.

        One question about copyrights though: the metadata module was
        mostly
        written by me (who signed CLA) as part of a contract particular
        government department. I believe they technically have
        copyrights, and
        agreed to open source it. What would be required though?
        Should they
        sign CLA for businesses?

        Kind Regards

        Niels



        _______________________________________________
        Geoserver-devel mailing list
        Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to