Hi,

For a community module promotion there is a step:

"Updating the website template to make the extension available."

Is this meant to add a link on this page:

https://geoserver.org/release/2.20.4/

And where does one modify this page?

Kind Regards

Niels

On 25/04/2022 18:27, Jody Garnett wrote:
If the customer is willing to sign the code contribution thing, which provides a section b to list the software being contributed to osgeo that is the most clear thing.

This code was always developed in the shared repo by folks that have signed the CLA? Or is their code that was copied on written by others …

On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 9:09 PM Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be> wrote:

    Hi,

    The code is not released under a different license. I contributed
    it under the CLA, which I signed. The question is only if it is
    necessary for the organization who paid for the work to sign the
    (corporate) CLA too. I thought Jody suggested this was not
    strictly necessary if I got the permission to contribute, perhaps
    he can clarify?

    The issue is simply a matter of red tape, about who should/can
    actually sign it; not an unwillingness to contribute under the
    geoserver license.

    Kind Regards

    Niels

    On 24/04/2022 10:25, Andrea Aime wrote:
    Ah, I just remembered this one:

    https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-186

    This proposal allows to contribute without CLA, even at the
    extension level (so far I believe we have only one at the
    community module level, GSR).
    Check out the restrictions for this kind of module.

    Cheers
    Andrea


    On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 10:08 AM Niels Charlier <ni...@scitus.be>
    wrote:

        I understood from Jody that nothing per se had to happen
        ("you should be good"). perhaps I misunderstood?

        Kind Regards

        Niels

        On 24/04/2022 09:56, Andrea Aime wrote:
        That said... while Jody did not vote, his CLA feedback is
        valid. We can't have the metadata module if the CLA bit
        has not been addressed. This is a blocker.

        Cheers
        Andrea

        On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 9:55 AM Andrea Aime
        <andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:

            Hi Niels,
            let's see what the rules say:

            
https://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/policies/gsip.html#voting-on-a-gsip

            In particular:

                Voting remains open for ten days or until all PSC
                members have cast their vote.
                * At the end of ten days time any remaining votes
                are assumed to be +0.

                A GSIP is accepted if it receives:
                * at least 30% “+1” votes, and
                * no “-1” votes (or all feedback from any “-1” votes
                has been addressed and any “-1” voters have changed
                their votes)

            Considering Jukka's last vote (still to be recorded in
            the GSIPs) I believe both proposals have passed.

            Cheers
            Andrea

            On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 3:02 PM Niels Charlier via
            Geoserver-devel <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
            wrote:

                Thank you, Jukka!


                Can I assume then that the absent votes are +0 and
                that both proposals are accepted?

                Kind Regards

                Niels

                On 21/04/2022 12:39, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote:

                +1 for both GSIP-311 and GSIP-312.

                -Jukka Rahkonen-

                *Lähettäjä:* Niels Charlier via Geoserver-devel
                <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
                <mailto:geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
                *Lähetetty:* torstai 21. huhtikuuta 2022 12.01
                *Vastaanottaja:* Jody Garnett
                <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
                <mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com>
                *Kopio:* Geoserver-devel
                <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
                <mailto:geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
                *Aihe:* Re: [Geoserver-devel] proposals: promote
                metadata and csw-iso to extensions

                Hello everyone,

                So if I get it right GSIP-311 has sufficient votes
                (three +1, no -1), but GSIP-312 doesn't (no -1, but
                only two +1). Does anyone else still want to add a
                vote?

                Kind Regards

                Niels

                On 05/04/2022 05:42, Jody Garnett wrote:

                    Hey Niels!

                    Not quite sure I understand the CLA question;
                    if you did the work on behalf of a particular
                    government department and had their
                    permission/authority to donate to OSGeo then
                    you should be good. If you are really
                    interested in being careful you could ask the
                    manager (whoever paid you or authorized the
                    work) to sign a "Corporate contributor license
                    
<https://www.osgeo.org/wp-content/uploads/corporate_contributor.pdf>",
                    and name the body of the work (metadata and
                    csw-iso) as the contributed work in "Schedule
                    B" at the bottom of the document.

                    Although it says "corporate" it is really:

                        ​"You" (or "Your") shall mean the copyright
                        owner or legal entity authorized by the
                        copyright owner that is making this
                        Agreement with the Foundation. "You" (or
                        "Your") shall mean the copyright owner or
                        legal entity authorized by the copyright
                        owner that is making this Agreement with
                        the Foundation.

                    So a government should be able to sign it.

                    --

                    Jody Garnett


                    On Apr 4, 2022 at 4:49:08 AM, Niels Charlier
                    via Geoserver-devel
                    <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:

                        Hello,

                        I have written up two proposals to promote
                        community modules "metadata"
                        and "csw-iso" to extensions.

                        https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-311

                        https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-312

                        I believe stability, test coverage, users,
                        are all okay. Please discuss.

                        One question about copyrights though: the
                        metadata module was mostly
                        written by me (who signed CLA) as part of a
                        contract particular
                        government department. I believe they
                        technically have copyrights, and
                        agreed to open source it. What would be
                        required though? Should they
                        sign CLA for businesses?

                        Kind Regards

                        Niels



                        _______________________________________________
                        Geoserver-devel mailing list
                        Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
                        
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

                _______________________________________________
                Geoserver-devel mailing list
                Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
                https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel



--
            Regards,

            Andrea Aime

            ==GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!

            Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us
            <http://bit.ly/gs-services-us>for more
            information.==Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolfTechnical Lead

            GeoSolutions Groupphone: +39 0584 962313

            fax:     +39 0584 1660272

            mob:   +39  333 8128928


            https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/
            <https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/>

            http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
            <http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it>

            -------------------------------------------------------


            Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati
            personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla
            protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni
            circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
            contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la
            cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i
            indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto
            per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
            operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se
            potesse darmene notizia.This email is intended only for
            the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
            contain information that is privileged, confidential or
            otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as
            provided by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” -
            copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the
            information herein by anyone other than the intended
            recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email
            by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or
            e-mail



--
        Regards,

        Andrea Aime

        ==GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!

        Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us
        <http://bit.ly/gs-services-us>for more information.==Ing.
        Andrea Aime @geowolfTechnical Lead

        GeoSolutions Groupphone: +39 0584 962313

        fax:     +39 0584 1660272

        mob:   +39  333 8128928


        https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/
        <https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/>

        http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
        <http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it>

        -------------------------------------------------------


        Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati
        personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla
        protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza
        inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli
        eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
        riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo
        scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è
        tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le
        sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.This email
        is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
        addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
        confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We
        remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679
        “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the
        information herein by anyone other than the intended
        recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by
        mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail



--
    Regards,

    Andrea Aime

    ==GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!

    Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us
    <http://bit.ly/gs-services-us>for more information.==Ing. Andrea
    Aime @geowolfTechnical Lead

    GeoSolutions Groupphone: +39 0584 962313

    fax:     +39 0584 1660272

    mob:   +39  333 8128928


    https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/
    <https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/>

    http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
    <http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it>

    -------------------------------------------------------


    Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali
    (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei
    dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla
    presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è
    un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i
    indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per errore,
    è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le
    sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.This email is
    intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed
    and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
    otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided
    by European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination
    or use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other
    than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received
    this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by telephone
    or e-mail

--
--
Jody Garnett
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to