I will vote +0 for both (sorry I have not had a chance to review closely). Jody
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 9:55 PM Andrea Aime < andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote: > Hi Niels, > let's see what the rules say: > > > https://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/developer/policies/gsip.html#voting-on-a-gsip > > In particular: > > Voting remains open for ten days or until all PSC members have cast their > vote. > * At the end of ten days time any remaining votes are assumed to be +0. > > A GSIP is accepted if it receives: > * at least 30% “+1” votes, and > * no “-1” votes (or all feedback from any “-1” votes has been addressed > and any “-1” voters have changed their votes) > > Considering Jukka's last vote (still to be recorded in the GSIPs) I > believe both proposals have passed. > > Cheers > Andrea > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 3:02 PM Niels Charlier via Geoserver-devel < > geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > >> Thank you, Jukka! >> >> >> Can I assume then that the absent votes are +0 and that both proposals >> are accepted? >> >> Kind Regards >> >> Niels >> On 21/04/2022 12:39, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote: >> >> +1 for both GSIP-311 and GSIP-312. >> >> >> >> -Jukka Rahkonen- >> >> >> >> *Lähettäjä:* Niels Charlier via Geoserver-devel >> <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >> <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >> *Lähetetty:* torstai 21. huhtikuuta 2022 12.01 >> *Vastaanottaja:* Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> >> <jody.garn...@gmail.com> >> *Kopio:* Geoserver-devel <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >> <geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >> *Aihe:* Re: [Geoserver-devel] proposals: promote metadata and csw-iso to >> extensions >> >> >> >> Hello everyone, >> >> So if I get it right GSIP-311 has sufficient votes (three +1, no -1), but >> GSIP-312 doesn't (no -1, but only two +1). Does anyone else still want to >> add a vote? >> >> Kind Regards >> >> Niels >> >> On 05/04/2022 05:42, Jody Garnett wrote: >> >> Hey Niels! >> >> >> >> Not quite sure I understand the CLA question; if you did the work on >> behalf of a particular government department and had their >> permission/authority to donate to OSGeo then you should be good. If you are >> really interested in being careful you could ask the manager (whoever paid >> you or authorized the work) to sign a "Corporate contributor license >> <https://www.osgeo.org/wp-content/uploads/corporate_contributor.pdf>", >> and name the body of the work (metadata and csw-iso) as the contributed >> work in "Schedule B" at the bottom of the document. >> >> >> >> Although it says "corporate" it is really: >> >> >> >> "You" (or "Your") shall mean the copyright owner or legal entity >> authorized by the copyright owner that is making this Agreement with the >> Foundation. "You" (or "Your") shall mean the copyright owner or legal >> entity authorized by the copyright owner that is making this Agreement with >> the Foundation. >> >> >> >> So a government should be able to sign it. >> >> -- >> >> Jody Garnett >> >> >> On Apr 4, 2022 at 4:49:08 AM, Niels Charlier via Geoserver-devel < >> geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I have written up two proposals to promote community modules "metadata" >> and "csw-iso" to extensions. >> >> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-311 >> >> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-312 >> >> I believe stability, test coverage, users, are all okay. Please discuss. >> >> One question about copyrights though: the metadata module was mostly >> written by me (who signed CLA) as part of a contract particular >> government department. I believe they technically have copyrights, and >> agreed to open source it. What would be required though? Should they >> sign CLA for businesses? >> >> Kind Regards >> >> Niels >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Geoserver-devel mailing list >> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Geoserver-devel mailing list >> Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >> > > > -- > > Regards, > > Andrea Aime > > == > GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! > > Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information. > == > > Ing. Andrea Aime > @geowolf > Technical Lead > > GeoSolutions Group > phone: +39 0584 962313 > > fax: +39 0584 1660272 > > mob: +39 333 8128928 > > https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/ > > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE > 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si > precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo > contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è > riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il > messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra > operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. > > This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is > addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or > otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by > European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this > e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please > notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail > -- -- Jody Garnett
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
