I do get my google tiles directly from google in approved way (and pay for 
them).  That is why I am more interested in a mapfish server managing all sorts 
of protocols rather that one tied to geoserver.  I am using leaflet as client 
and mixing and matching from all over the show. The big issue with esri vector 
tiles (which have sadly become very popular) is that the leaflet plugin can 
only handle web Mercator. I looked the issue and messy. I will look at geotools 
code and think about it some more.

From: Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 12:30 PM
To: Phil Scadden <p.scad...@gns.cri.nz>
Cc: geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-users] Release mapfish print v2



CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe:
So you know that use of google tiles is not a thing we are supposed to do 
right? They really want you to use their javascript api - so that the tiles can 
be paid for (by your application user's privacy...).  There all kinds of 
technical ways around this of course, but ethical ways around it are suspect ...

We have all kinds of code for messing with data if you wish to take on vector 
tiles. I think there is even something that reads them, and retrojects them for 
geowebcache, so it is all within reach if you want to play.

Still the origional motivator that paid for printing (and thus PDF output also) 
was parties that had a regulated requirement to output paper maps at specific 
scales. I think we have moved beyond that now 🙂

--
Jody Garnett


On Jul 8, 2024 at 3:23:46 PM, Phil Scadden 
<p.scad...@gns.cri.nz<mailto:p.scad...@gns.cri.nz>> wrote:
For my 2c, I was excited when heard about mapfish a decade or so ago, but 
quickly lost interest because it lacked support for google tiles. If more map 
layers were supported, then I suspect there would be more interest. I have 
users of my webmaps (which depend on slightly better than browser screenshots) 
asking for higher res imagery. Layer support was the achilles heel. Better 
support for ESRI services and vector tiles would be needed for it to be really 
interesting. Since virtually all my webmapping deals with layers from multiple 
services, not just geoserver, a mapfish server that is only operating on a 
single geoserver instance is less interesting.

From: Tiago Vieira <tixvie...@gmail.com<mailto:tixvie...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 4:23 AM
To: Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com<mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com>>
Cc: 
geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Geoserver-users] Release mapfish print v2



CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe:
😀

So, as far as I understand you are suggesting to bring the mapfish print to the 
community module of geoserver?
Is it considered a community module or extension? Because it's on the 
extensions download page of geoserver. (https://geoserver.org/release/stable/ 
--> Cartography)

I can give it a try on doing that.

Tiago Vieira


On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 at 15:59, Jody Garnett 
<jody.garn...@gmail.com<mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have nothing against the printing plugin - just that it needs some love 🙂

What would be the best way to support this thing? If it is only the geoserver 
project using mapfish printv2 then the geoserver community should come up with 
a plan ... so I was presenting some plans :P​

If you are making pull-requests then you have some technical capacity so you 
are exactly who we want to make plans with....
--
Jody Garnett


On Jul 8, 2024 at 12:57:05 AM, Tiago Vieira 
<tixvie...@gmail.com<mailto:tixvie...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Jody,

This is the project that supports the "Printing" extension in geoserver, right?
I don't know if many people use it, but in our project we use this printing 
plugin a long time ago :)

Is there any alternative to have a vectorial print? And also, with this printv2 
we are able to print maps with google maps tiles included.

I think the functionality of naming the PDF Layers is essential, so an end-user 
will be able to have a human readable translation, instead of internal layer 
names.

Thanks,
Tiago Vieira


On Mon, 8 Jul 2024 at 01:05, Jody Garnett 
<jody.garn...@gmail.com<mailto:jody.garn...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I have commit access; but really this project ended a long time ago.

So you know of people who are interested in this functionality? It would be 
good to assemble an activity to update / migrate / or inokement something 
comparable in geotools.

--
Jody Garnett


On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 1:04 PM Tiago Vieira 
<tixvie...@gmail.com<mailto:tixvie...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi,

I don't know if this is the right mailing list to use, but do you know who can 
review the 3 PR in the mapfish print v2 github, and do a new release to upgrade 
the extensions of a next geoserver version.
https://github.com/mapfish/mapfish-print-v2/pulls


Thank you,
Tiago Vieira
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential and may not be used, 
published or redistributed without the prior written consent of the Institute 
of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS Science). If received in error 
please destroy and immediately notify GNS Science. Do not copy or disclose the 
contents.
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
Notice: This email and any attachments are confidential and may not be used, 
published or redistributed without the prior written consent of the Institute 
of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited (GNS Science). If received in error 
please destroy and immediately notify GNS Science. Do not copy or disclose the 
contents.
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to