Hello.

I have a GeoServer 2.1.0 installed on a server.

I have setup some Image Mosaic layers on this GeoServer based on some groups
of GeoTiff files in their original projection (for example EPSG:29902 for
Ireland or EPSG:28992 for the Netherlands).

These layers have a good image display quality when I visualize them in WMS
with the integrated OpenLayers component in their original projection.

http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/file/n6809910/wms.jpg 

I have then seeded this layer with GeoWebCache in EPSG:900913 projection (in
order to integrate these layers in Google Maps API). When I visualize the
result of this seeded layer in GeoWebCache integrated OpenLayers, the images
have a worse display quality.

http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/file/n6809910/gwc.jpg 

Does this quality degradation come from the tiled cache creation or from the
reprojection ?
Is there a parameter to change to get a better image quality in the
reprojected cache ?

I have tried to change the WMS compression parameters in GeoServer to 0 (no
compression), it doesn't seem to change anything.

I have also tried to query the cache in different image formats (JPEG, GIF,
PNG, ...), the problem seems to appear in every image format.

Thank you for your help.

Best regards.

Patrick.

--
View this message in context: 
http://osgeo-org.1803224.n2.nabble.com/ImageMosaic-layer-reprojected-with-GeoWebCache-Bad-image-quality-tp6809910p6809910.html
Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to