I believe  there is a Queryable checkbox under myLayer > Publish > WMS 
Settings.

On 2/22/2012 10:44 AM, coastalrocket wrote:
> Any change in this? I would like to make a layer non-queryable for
> getInfoRequests but at the same time still display it.
>
> If that's not possible is there another way to cause a service exception on
> a getFeatuerRequest? I did think about sending a CRS value that isn't
> supported by the geoserver instance but in the case of the map application
> that i'm developing this is caught when the user tries to display the map
> image. The layer is automatically turned off so no getFeatureInfo request is
> made.
>
> I'm trying to make my web app more robust by testing service exceptions
> except i can't think of a way to generate service exceptions.
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/how-to-stop-a-layer-being-queryable-tp3809949p4495449.html
> Sent from the GeoServer - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Virtualization&  Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
> Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
> also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

-- 
Stephen Crawford
Center for Environmental Informatics
The Pennsylvania State University




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing 
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to