On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Stephen V. Mather <[email protected]> wrote: > The additional rotation is proportional to the longitude in some > non-cylindrical cases (at least some conical and pole-centered stereographic > projections), so it's trivial for _some_ cases... . :) It's quite trivial > in some cylindrical projections.
Yep, I did not even consider a projection specific approach, doing the fully general case, not having any assumption in the code about the actual projection is doable, just not trivial Cheers Andrea -- Ing. Andrea Aime GeoSolutions S.A.S. Tech lead Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 55054 Massarosa (LU) Italy phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 962313 mob: +39 339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime http://twitter.com/geowolf ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
