On 21/05/16 20:41, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> > wrote: >> I think that coverage aggregation in NetCDF might be a job for WPS. > Ah, WPS, the one protocol to rule them all :-)
And in the darkness bind them. :-) > (but seriously, I agree it's the only fully compliant option, the other > potential avenue being making a vendor extension to the WCS standard) Yes, that could work. Perhaps supporting a comma-separated list of coverage IDs, and then aggregating them on output? A bit fiddly if the underlying coverages have different dimensions and coordinate variables, but it could be done. Extending WCS would mean that the method for obtaining an aggregated coverage would be very similar to the method for obtaining a single coverage. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Director Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/> New Zealand ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched! https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j _______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
