Hi,

I wonder what the sub-coverages in the OGC Coverage Implementation Schema (CIS) 
will add to the soup https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/64632

-Jukka Rahkonen-

Andrea Aime wrote:

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 21/05/16 20:41, Andrea Aime wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
I think that coverage aggregation in NetCDF might be a job for WPS.
Ah, WPS, the one protocol to rule them all :-)

And in the darkness bind them.  :-)

Muwhaahhahahahaa!!!!


(but seriously, I agree it's the only fully compliant option, the other
potential avenue being making a vendor extension to the WCS standard)

Yes, that could work. Perhaps supporting a comma-separated list of coverage 
IDs, and then aggregating them on output? A bit fiddly if the underlying 
coverages have different dimensions and coordinate variables, but it could be 
done. Extending WCS would mean that the method for obtaining an aggregated 
coverage would be very similar to the method for obtaining a single coverage.

Right. To be honest, I'm not against the idea.
The major argument against would be, I guess, how can a client know if an 
output format is multi-coverage capable, and what conditions do the 
multi-coverages have to respect? (nothing, same CRS, same data type, and so on?)
But to be honest, we go out with arcgrid, how does a client know that arcgrid 
is not multiband capable?

Given that only a geoserver specific client would know that coverageid might 
take a comma separate list of values,
the worry about output format seems moot, it seems to me the client would have 
to be custom-made regardless.

The interesting part is imho another, how does one allow multi-coverage without 
too deep changes in the WCS 2.0
machinery? I'd say, by having DefaultWebCoverageService20 loop over the ids, 
getting a response out of each,
and then build a new multi-coverage response object that only netcdf knows how 
to handle:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/blob/master/src/wcs2_0/src/main/java/org/geoserver/wcs2_0/DefaultWebCoverageService20.java#L138

Cheers
Andrea

--
==
GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
http://goo.gl/it488V for more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via di Montramito 3/A
55054  Massarosa (LU)
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it


AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.Lgs. 196/2003

Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e/o nel/i 
file/s allegato/i sono da considerarsi strettamente riservate. Il loro utilizzo 
è consentito esclusivamente al destinatario del messaggio, per le finalità 
indicate nel messaggio stesso. Qualora riceviate questo messaggio senza esserne 
il destinatario, Vi preghiamo cortesemente di darcene notizia via e-mail e di 
procedere alla distruzione del messaggio stesso, cancellandolo dal Vostro 
sistema. Conservare il messaggio stesso, divulgarlo anche in parte, 
distribuirlo ad altri soggetti, copiarlo, od utilizzarlo per finalità diverse, 
costituisce comportamento contrario ai principi dettati dal D.Lgs. 196/2003.



The information in this message and/or attachments, is intended solely for the 
attention and use of the named addressee(s) and may be confidential or 
proprietary in nature or covered by the provisions of privacy act (Legislative 
Decree June, 30 2003, no.196 - Italy's New Data Protection Code).Any use not in 
accord with its purpose, any disclosure, reproduction, copying, distribution, 
or either dissemination, either whole or partial, is strictly forbidden except 
previous formal approval of the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact immediately the sender by telephone, fax or e-mail 
and delete the information in this message that has been received in error. The 
sender does not give any warranty or accept liability as the content, accuracy 
or completeness of sent messages and accepts no responsibility  for changes 
made after they were sent or for other risks which arise as a result of e-mail 
transmission, viruses, etc.

-------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to